On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:10:32PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Remove the sink vs. source limit mess from intel_dp_max_link_bw() and
> just move the source restriction checks to intel_dp_source_rates().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index aa373a2..61538f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -126,19 +126,11 @@ int
>  intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>       int max_link_bw = intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE];
> -     struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp->attached_connector->base.dev;
>  
>       switch (max_link_bw) {
>       case DP_LINK_BW_1_62:
>       case DP_LINK_BW_2_7:
> -             break;
> -     case DP_LINK_BW_5_4: /* 1.2 capable displays may advertise higher bw */
> -             if (((IS_HASWELL(dev) && !IS_HSW_ULX(dev)) ||
> -                  INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) &&
> -                 intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= 0x12)
> -                     max_link_bw = DP_LINK_BW_5_4;
> -             else
> -                     max_link_bw = DP_LINK_BW_2_7;
> +     case DP_LINK_BW_5_4:

This hunk conflicts with the WaDisableHBR2 patch. Resolved it while
applying.
-Daniel

>               break;
>       default:
>               WARN(1, "invalid max DP link bw val %x, using 1.62Gbps\n",
> @@ -1151,10 +1143,8 @@ intel_dp_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, const 
> int **sink_rates)
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -intel_dp_source_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, const int **source_rates)
> +intel_dp_source_rates(struct drm_device *dev, const int **source_rates)
>  {
> -     struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
> -
>       if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) {
>               *source_rates = gen9_rates;
>               return ARRAY_SIZE(gen9_rates);
> @@ -1162,7 +1152,11 @@ intel_dp_source_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, const 
> int **source_rates)
>  
>       *source_rates = default_rates;
>  
> -     return (intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp) >> 3) + 1;
> +     if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8 ||
> +         (IS_HASWELL(dev) && !IS_HSW_ULX(dev)))
> +             return (DP_LINK_BW_5_4 >> 3) + 1;
> +     else
> +             return (DP_LINK_BW_2_7 >> 3) + 1;
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -1256,7 +1250,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>       sink_len = intel_dp_sink_rates(intel_dp, &sink_rates);
>  
> -     source_len = intel_dp_source_rates(intel_dp, &source_rates);
> +     source_len = intel_dp_source_rates(dev, &source_rates);
>  
>       supported_len = intel_supported_rates(source_rates, source_len,
>                               sink_rates, sink_len, supported_rates);
> -- 
> 2.0.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to