On 17/03/2015 09:39, Imre Deak wrote:
From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index e23cbdc..000f608 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -970,8 +970,8 @@ static int gen9_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs
*ring)
* FIXME: don't apply the following on BXT for stepping C. On BXT A0
* the flag reads back as 0.
*/
- /* WaDisableMaskBasedCammingInRCC:bxtA */
- if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
+ /* WaDisableMaskBasedCammingInRCC:sklC,bxtA */
+ if (INTEL_REVID(dev) == SKL_REVID_C0 || IS_BROXTON(dev))
This looks wrong. (IS_BROXTON && BXT_REVID_C0) || (IS_SKYLAKE &&
SKL_REVID_C0) please.
WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(SLICE_ECO_CHICKEN0,
PIXEL_MASK_CAMMING_DISABLE);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
