On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 09:36 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 09:35:27AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 05:43:40PM +0000, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > > > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:54 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:24:24PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > > This will allow manual tests when crc isn't available. > > > > > > > > > > v2: Remove unused and non-sense buf->size and decrease buf->stride a > > > > > bit as suggested by Daniel. > > > > > > > > buf->size isn't nonsense really, it does seem to match what we've > > > > allocated. But it also seems unused in the rendercpy functions I've > > > > checked. Imo you should keep that line > > > > > > oh sure, bad phrase.... the value 4 was nonsense. > > > But if I increases that it fails. Without setting it works. > > > What do you think? > > > > If just keeping that line makes the test work there's something _really_ > > fishy going on. If it persists after git clean -dfx and full recompile I'd > > dig into it, since this really doesn't make sense.
But what are the values of size and stride you believe it should work in a actual visible way? > > valgrined might be the best tool for a first attempt at figuring out > what's wrong. > -Daniel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
