On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:37:09AM +0530, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote:
>
>
> On 3/27/2015 12:50 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >Let's know beforehand if PSR is ready and will be enabled so we can
> >prevent DRRS to get enabled.
> >
> >v2: Removing is_edp_psr func that is not used after this patch.
> > Rename match_conditions and document it since it is now external.
> > Moving to a propper place as pointed out by Sivakumar.
> > Use a better name as pointed out by Ram.
> >
> >Cc: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasim...@intel.com>
> >Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalinga...@intel.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> >---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 50
> > +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >index 35cdb48..9112ad9 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >@@ -10367,6 +10367,7 @@ static void intel_dump_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc
> >*crtc,
> > pipe_config->pch_pfit.pos,
> > pipe_config->pch_pfit.size,
> > pipe_config->pch_pfit.enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> >+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("psr ready: %i\n", pipe_config->psr_ready);
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ips: %i\n", pipe_config->ips_enabled);
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("double wide: %i\n", pipe_config->double_wide);
> > }
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >index 637dd53..e6b1c42 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >@@ -1388,6 +1388,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > */
> > min_lane_count = max_lane_count;
> > min_clock = max_clock;
> >+
> >+ pipe_config->psr_ready = intel_psr_ready(intel_dp);
> > }
> > for (; bpp >= 6*3; bpp -= 2*3) {
> This is still updated during every modeset. since PSR is specific to eDP,
> can this new variable be stored inside intel_dp and be updated in
> intel_edp_init_connector itself ? that way we will initialize this during
> driver load and can reuse it forever.
Imo that's totally fine. I actually prefer to recompute state instead of
storing it, since that cuts out one indirection. I'm totally fine with
this approach here.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
