On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 03:20:08PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:01:59AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > requests are even more frequently allocated than objects and equally > > benefit from having a dedicated slab. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > vmas, while we're at it?
As a second patch probably. The test cases I was looking at stressed requests rather than ctx. Though if we get a lightweight full-ppgtt, there are a few synmark that would definitely benefit from a vmas slab. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
