On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:33:14PM +0100, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
>
> Split the execbuffer() function in half. The first half collects and validates
> all the information requried to process the batch buffer. It also does all the
> object pinning, relocations, active list management, etc - basically anything
> that must be done upfront before the IOCTL returns and allows the user land
> side
> to start changing/freeing things. The second half does the actual ring
> submission.
>
> This change implements the split but leaves the back half being called
> directly
> from the end of the front half.
>
> Change-Id: I5e1c77639ce526ab2401b0323186c518bf13da0a
> For: VIZ-1587
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 11 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 130
> ++++++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 58 +++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 289ddd6..28d51ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1684,10 +1684,18 @@ struct i915_execbuffer_params {
> struct drm_device *dev;
> struct drm_file *file;
> uint32_t dispatch_flags;
> + uint32_t args_flags;
> uint32_t args_batch_start_offset;
> + uint32_t args_batch_len;
> + uint32_t args_num_cliprects;
> + uint32_t args_DR1;
> + uint32_t args_DR4;
> uint32_t batch_obj_vm_offset;
> struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj;
> + struct drm_clip_rect *cliprects;
> + uint32_t instp_mask;
> + int instp_mode;
> struct intel_context *ctx;
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> };
> @@ -1929,6 +1937,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> int (*execbuf_submit)(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params,
> struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
> struct list_head *vmas);
> + int (*execbuf_final)(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params);
No need for this vfunc since you only call this from specialized and not
generic code.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
