Reviewed the patch & it looks fine.
Reviewed-by: "Akash Goel <akash.g...@intel.com>"
On 7/29/2015 9:53 PM, Michel Thierry wrote:
Otherwise it can overflow in 48-bit mode, and cause an incorrect
exec_start.
Before commit 5f19e2bffa63a91cd4ac1adcec648e14a44277ce ("drm/i915: Merged
the many do_execbuf() parameters into a structure"), it was already an u64.
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 33926d9..ed2fbcd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1674,7 +1674,7 @@ struct i915_execbuffer_params {
struct drm_file *file;
uint32_t dispatch_flags;
uint32_t args_batch_start_offset;
- uint32_t batch_obj_vm_offset;
+ uint64_t batch_obj_vm_offset;
struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj;
struct intel_context *ctx;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
