On 08/10/2015 07:15 AM, David Weinehall wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On 08/06/2015 02:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:52:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:53:17PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote: >>>>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:32:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>>>> A simple functional test here which does: >>>>>> a) an execbuf with just 1 batch. With full ppgtt you should get that one >>>>>> at offset 0. If not, skip the testcase. >>>>>> b) set the NO_ZEROMAP property. >>>>>> c) re-run the same batch, assert that now the buffer is relocated to >>>>>> something non-0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just to make sure we have a bare minimal testcase to make sure we don't >>>>>> break this. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe this should be added to another test rather than here? This test >>>>> is described as a: >>>>> >>>>> "Basic test for context set/get param input validation." >>>>> >>>>> Somehow I feel that testing whether the *functionality* is correct >>>>> does not belong in this test, but rather in some test case that's >>>>> already related to execbufs, or even a dedicated test case. >>>>> >>>>> But that might be over-engineering. Opinions? >>>> >>>> Yeah separate testcase would fit better, agreed. >>> >>> Update version of this patch is still missing. I'll need to revert the >>> kernel side if this one doesn't show up soonish. >>> >>> Also you're breaking the invalid-flags testcase (did you bother to run >>> them all and check for regressions?) which Jesse spotted, and with the new >>> basic set this will be a P1 "I'm going to block everything" bug. >> >> We really need man pages for new ioctls as well in libdrm. > > Hmmm, this isn't a new ioctl, just a context parameter that can be > set/queried using a pre-existing ioctl, but I can modify the existing > manual page (if there is one?) to include information about the new > parameter.
Yeah we don't have one for this ioctl unfortunately. There are examples of other ioctl man pages in the libdrm repo though; you could copy one of those and do one for the context get/set ioctl. If you don't have any time, can you just file a JIRA instead? We'll get to it eventually... :) Thanks, Jesse _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
