Ok..., Will resubmit the patch with suggested changes.

Regards,
-Mahesh

On 8/24/2015 3:53 PM, Jindal, Sonika wrote:
Can you please add the test case name to the commit message?
Also, this should be split into two patches one addressing the divide by zero 
error and another one to add plane formats.

Regards,
Sonika

-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of 
Kumar, Mahesh
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 7:21 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/skl+: Add YUV pixel format in 
Capability list

GEN >= 9 supports YUV format for all planes, but it's not exported in 
Capability list of primary plane. Add YUV formats in skl_primary_formats list.
Don't rely on fb->bits_per_pixel as intel_framebuffer_init is not filling 
bits_per_pixel field of fb-struct for YUV pixel format.
This leads to divide by zero error during watermark calculation.

V2: Don't break NV12 case.

Signed-off-by: Kumar, Mahesh <mahesh1.ku...@intel.com>
Cc: Konduru, Chandra <chandra.kond...@intel.com>
---

  IGT changes made for testcase will be sent in separate patch.

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 3 ++-
  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index af0bcfe..d31704a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ static const uint32_t skl_primary_formats[] = {
        DRM_FORMAT_ABGR8888,
        DRM_FORMAT_XRGB2101010,
        DRM_FORMAT_XBGR2101010,
+       DRM_FORMAT_YUYV,
+       DRM_FORMAT_YVYU,
+       DRM_FORMAT_UYVY,
+       DRM_FORMAT_VYUY,
  };
/* Cursor formats */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c 
index 5eeddc9..5768f8c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3164,7 +3164,8 @@ static void skl_compute_wm_pipe_parameters(struct 
drm_crtc *crtc,
                if (fb) {
                        p->plane[0].enabled = true;
                        p->plane[0].bytes_per_pixel = fb->pixel_format == 
DRM_FORMAT_NV12 ?
-                               drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 1) : 
fb->bits_per_pixel / 8;
+                               drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 1) :
+                               drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 0);
                        p->plane[0].y_bytes_per_pixel = fb->pixel_format == 
DRM_FORMAT_NV12 ?
                                drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 0) : 0;
                        p->plane[0].tiling = fb->modifier[0];
--
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to