On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 06:02:26PM -0700, Chandra Konduru wrote:
> This patch stages a scaler request when input format
> is NV12. The same scaler does both chroma-upsampling
> and resolution scaling as needed.
> 
> v2:
> -Added helper function for need_scaling (Ville)
> 
> v3:
> -Rebased to current kernel version 4.2.0.rc4 (me)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.kond...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 3ee1c17..411b211 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -4341,10 +4341,27 @@ static void cpt_verify_modeset(struct drm_device 
> *dev, int pipe)
>       }
>  }
>  
> +static int skl_need_scaling(int src_w, int dst_w, int src_h, int dst_h,

Make it bool.

I'd reorder the arguments to group src_w and src_h together,
and dst_w and dst_h together.

> +     int rotation, uint32_t pixel_format)

Indentation is weird. rotation should be unsigned int.

> +{
> +     /* scaling is required when src dst sizes doesn't match or format is 
> NV12 */
> +     if (src_w != dst_w || src_h != dst_h)
> +             return 1;
> +
> +     if (intel_rotation_90_or_270(rotation) &&
> +                     (src_h != dst_w || src_w != dst_h))
> +             return 1;

I would make this something like:

{
        if (format == NV12)
                return true;
        
        if (90_270)
                return ...;
        else
                return ...;
}

> +
> +     if (pixel_format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12)
> +             return 1;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, bool force_detach,
>                 unsigned scaler_user, int *scaler_id, unsigned int rotation,
> -               int src_w, int src_h, int dst_w, int dst_h)
> +               int src_w, int src_h, int dst_w, int dst_h, uint32_t 
> pixel_format)
>  {
>       struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_state =
>               &crtc_state->scaler_state;
> @@ -4352,9 +4369,8 @@ skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, 
> bool force_detach,
>               to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>       int need_scaling;
>  
> -     need_scaling = intel_rotation_90_or_270(rotation) ?
> -             (src_h != dst_w || src_w != dst_h):
> -             (src_w != dst_w || src_h != dst_h);
> +     need_scaling = skl_need_scaling(src_w, dst_w, src_h, dst_h, rotation,
> +             pixel_format);
>  
>       /*
>        * if plane is being disabled or scaler is no more required or force 
> detach
> @@ -4423,7 +4439,7 @@ int skl_update_scaler_crtc(struct intel_crtc_state 
> *state)
>       return skl_update_scaler(state, !state->base.active, SKL_CRTC_INDEX,
>               &state->scaler_state.scaler_id, DRM_ROTATE_0,
>               state->pipe_src_w, state->pipe_src_h,
> -             adjusted_mode->hdisplay, adjusted_mode->vdisplay);
> +             adjusted_mode->hdisplay, adjusted_mode->vdisplay, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -4459,7 +4475,8 @@ static int skl_update_scaler_plane(struct 
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>                               drm_rect_width(&plane_state->src) >> 16,
>                               drm_rect_height(&plane_state->src) >> 16,
>                               drm_rect_width(&plane_state->dst),
> -                             drm_rect_height(&plane_state->dst));
> +                             drm_rect_height(&plane_state->dst),
> +                             fb ? fb->pixel_format : 0);
>  
>       if (ret || plane_state->scaler_id < 0)
>               return ret;
> @@ -4484,6 +4501,7 @@ static int skl_update_scaler_plane(struct 
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>       case DRM_FORMAT_YVYU:
>       case DRM_FORMAT_UYVY:
>       case DRM_FORMAT_VYUY:
> +     case DRM_FORMAT_NV12:
>               break;
>       default:
>               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d] FB:%d unsupported scaling format 
> 0x%x\n",
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to