On 02/09/15 23:52, yu....@intel.com wrote:
From: Alex Dai <yu....@intel.com>

Bit 16 of GuC status indicates resuming from RC6. The LAPIC_DONE
status is a reliable readiness flag only when resuming from RC6.
This fix a racing issue that allocation of doorbell fails whilst
GuC init is not finished.

Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu....@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h     | 1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 5 +++--
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h
index 8c8e574..dd0e1e8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
  #define   GS_UKERNEL_READY              (0xF0 << GS_UKERNEL_SHIFT)
  #define   GS_MIA_SHIFT                        16
  #define   GS_MIA_MASK                   (0x07 << GS_MIA_SHIFT)
+#define   GS_MIA_CORE_STATE              (1 << GS_MIA_SHIFT)

  #define SOFT_SCRATCH(n)                       (0xc180 + ((n) * 4))

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index 5eafd31..5823615 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -209,9 +209,10 @@ static inline bool guc_ucode_response(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                                      u32 *status)
  {
        u32 val = I915_READ(GUC_STATUS);
+       u32 uk_val = val & GS_UKERNEL_MASK;
        *status = val;
-       return ((val & GS_UKERNEL_MASK) == GS_UKERNEL_READY ||
-               (val & GS_UKERNEL_MASK) == GS_UKERNEL_LAPIC_DONE);
+       return (uk_val == GS_UKERNEL_READY ||
+               ((val & GS_MIA_CORE_STATE) && uk_val == GS_UKERNEL_LAPIC_DONE));
  }

  /*

This does indeed fix the problem of not being able to *re*initialise the GuC correctly after a hang/reset/reload cycle :) However I think the last line looks quite confusing, especially because of the mix of bitwise and logical operators (we have &, &&, and || all in one expression).

So I think it might be clearer if spelled out in two stages:

 {
        u32 val = I915_READ(GUC_STATUS);
+       u32 uk_val = val & GS_UKERNEL_MASK;
        *status = val;
-       return ((val & GS_UKERNEL_MASK) == GS_UKERNEL_READY ||
-               (val & GS_UKERNEL_MASK) == GS_UKERNEL_LAPIC_DONE);
+
+       /* Iff resuming from RC6, look for LAPIC_DONE */
+       if (val & GS_MIA_CORE_STATE)
+               if (uk_val == GS_UKERNEL_LAPIC_DONE)
+                       return true;
+
+       /* Otherwise just check whether the uKernel is READY */
+       return uk_val == GS_UKERNEL_READY;
 }

Other than that I'm quite happy with it, so either version gets a

Reviewed-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gor...@intel.com>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to