On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 06:54:38PM -0700, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
>> While pinning a fb object to the display plane, only install a fence
>> if the object is using a normal view. This corresponds with the
>> behavior found in i915_gem_object_do_pin() where the fencability
>> criteria is determined only for objects with normal views.
>> 
>> v2:
>> Look at the object's map_and_fenceable flag to determine whether to
>> install a fence or not (Chris).
>> 
>> v3:
>> Pin and unpin a fence only if the current view type is normal.
>> 
>> v4:
>> Extend the "view type is normal" check for pin_fence as well.
>> 
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasire...@intel.com>
>
> lgtm
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

Pushed to drm-intel-next-fixes, thanks for the patch and review.

BR,
Jani.

>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 36 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 2fdfca1..9c80968 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -2419,22 +2419,24 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>       * framebuffer compression.  For simplicity, we always install
>>       * a fence as the cost is not that onerous.
>>       */
>> -    ret = i915_gem_object_get_fence(obj);
>> -    if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
>> -            /*
>> -             * -EDEADLK means there are no free fences
>> -             * no pending flips.
>> -             *
>> -             * This is propagated to atomic, but it uses
>> -             * -EDEADLK to force a locking recovery, so
>> -             * change the returned error to -EBUSY.
>> -             */
>> -            ret = -EBUSY;
>> -            goto err_unpin;
>> -    } else if (ret)
>> -            goto err_unpin;
>> +    if (view.type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL) {
>> +            ret = i915_gem_object_get_fence(obj);
>> +            if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
>> +                    /*
>> +                     * -EDEADLK means there are no free fences
>> +                     * no pending flips.
>> +                     *
>> +                     * This is propagated to atomic, but it uses
>> +                     * -EDEADLK to force a locking recovery, so
>> +                     * change the returned error to -EBUSY.
>> +                     */
>> +                    ret = -EBUSY;
>> +                    goto err_unpin;
>> +            } else if (ret)
>> +                    goto err_unpin;
>>  
>> -    i915_gem_object_pin_fence(obj);
>> +            i915_gem_object_pin_fence(obj);
>> +    }
>>  
>>      dev_priv->mm.interruptible = true;
>>      intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>> @@ -2460,7 +2462,9 @@ static void intel_unpin_fb_obj(struct drm_framebuffer 
>> *fb,
>>      ret = intel_fill_fb_ggtt_view(&view, fb, plane_state);
>>      WARN_ONCE(ret, "Couldn't get view from plane state!");
>>  
>> -    i915_gem_object_unpin_fence(obj);
>> +    if (view.type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL)
>> +            i915_gem_object_unpin_fence(obj);
>> +
>>      i915_gem_object_unpin_from_display_plane(obj, &view);
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.4.3

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to