On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:52:31PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > Op 05-11-15 om 12:29 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:10:51PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> If FBC is disabled we will still call intel_fbc_invalidate(), and as a > >> result we may call intel_fbc_deactivate(), which will try to touch > >> registers. > >> > >> I'm pretty sure I saw this happen on a runtime suspended device, and > > This is one of the BAT failures we have. I don't really understand why > > we track the frontbuffer bits with FBC totally disabled, but this fix > > seems simple enough on its own. Not sure if it applies without the > > others, but if it doesn't I suggest trying to reorder the patchset so > > we can put this in ASAP. > > > For the commit message what BAT is affected?
/me looks pm_rpm@basic-rte at least. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
