There is no point in checking the refcount just after increasing it so
remove the assert from the get helper. Otoh, we should check the
refcount before decreasing it, so add it to the put helper.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index 64da5af..db63b8a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -2132,7 +2132,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_get(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
pm_runtime_get_sync(device);
atomic_inc(&dev_priv->pm.wakelock_count);
- assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
}
/**
@@ -2176,6 +2175,7 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
+ assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakelock_count);
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(device);
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
