Hey, On 13 November 2015 at 16:36, Zanoni, Paulo R <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> wrote: > Em Sex, 2015-11-13 às 15:49 +0000, Daniel Stone escreveu: >> On 4 November 2015 at 19:10, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> >> wrote: >> > So Ville pointed a problem on patch 02/26 of the previous series, >> > and the nice >> > fix for that would make me rebase most of the subsequent patches. >> > In order to >> > avoid blocking the other patches on the review of patch 02 and in >> > order to avoid >> > having to rebase everything again and again during this I decided >> > to change the >> > order of the patches on the series and try to get a smaller chunk >> > of patches >> > merged before moving on to the others. >> > >> > These first 13 patches are somewhat trivial and are mostly just >> > moving code >> > around, with only one or two simple bug fixes. If you wonder why >> > some of these >> > changes are needed, please go check the complete series (the short >> > answer is: >> > most of the changes are needed for the new model with >> > enable/disable + >> > activate/deactivate). >> > >> > After all these patches are merged I'll resend the rest. >> >> This series is missing 01/26 of your previous series (make >> no_fbc_reason a string). > > It was already merged when I resent: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?id=bf6189c6f062b5cd6ca0d4 > 6754e4c3064643f48c
Sorry, missed that somehow! Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
