On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:50:13PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> If an atomic update fails intel_crtc->atomic may have have some values left
> from the last atomic check. One example is atomic->wait_for_vblank,
> which results in spurious errors in kms_flip.
> 
> Testcase: kms_flip
> Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org #v4.3
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index b5f7493213b7..b9539b14fe0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -13141,6 +13141,9 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>               struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config =
>                       to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state);
>  
> +             memset(&to_intel_crtc(crtc)->atomic, 0,
> +                    sizeof(struct intel_crtc_atomic_commit));

sizeof(to_intel_crtc(crtc)->atomic) would be better.

This cures a ton of "wait_for_vblank called with a disabled pipe"
type of errors.

Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

> +
>               /* Catch I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED */
>               if (crtc_state->mode.private_flags != 
> crtc->state->mode.private_flags)
>                       crtc_state->mode_changed = true;

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to