On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:44:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 03:22:23PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Cc: Thomas Wood <thomas.w...@intel.com> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> > > Given that we have all that in piglit already the commit message is a bit > thin on justification. Why do we need this in igt too? How does this > interact with the piglit dmesg capture?
It's doesn't interfere with anyone else parsing kmsg/dmesg for themselves, but it adds very useful functionality to standalone igt. Which to me is significantly more valuable and I have been patching it into igt for over a year and wished it was taken more seriously given the number of incorrect bug reports generated. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
