Hey,

On 19 November 2015 at 18:24, Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:59:10PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> +static inline const char *
>> +intel_display_power_domain_str(enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
>
> It's still const. And I assume now we end up duplicating these strings
> in every object file that calls this. Why don't you just remove the
> "static" from the original?

Right, 'unstatic' is what I meant. Dropping const wouldn't have been
very clever.

Surely gcc's DCE pass will trivially eliminate this? I put it so it
could lie next to the enum definition itself, but if you'd prefer,
I'll happily move the definition to intel_runtime_pm.c (or whatever
shed colour is deemed appropriate) instead.

Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to