On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 09:20:16AM -0800, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com>
> 
> Add SKL and KBL cdclk changes during modeset. Taking into account new
> linkrates available using 8640 VCO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   68 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 2d7ea95..bed03cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -9727,6 +9727,69 @@ static void broadwell_modeset_commit_cdclk(struct 
> drm_atomic_state *old_state)
>       broadwell_set_cdclk(dev, req_cdclk);
>  }
>  
> +static int skl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->dev);
> +     int max_pixclk = ilk_max_pixel_rate(state);
> +     int cdclk;
> +     uint32_t linkrate;
> +
> +     linkrate = (I915_READ(DPLL_CTRL1) &
> +                 DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_MASK(SKL_DPLL0)) >> 1;

I don't think we should read this from the hardware here. Instead
we should stash the proper vco somewhere under dev_priv. Well, we
already have the boot_cdclk there, which is more or less just that.
What's really missing is code to fix up our initial boot_cdclk
choice if it turns out to be wrong. Where would it get fixed? I
assume we'd do that during/after eDP probing since then we should
know what link rate we want to use.

> +
> +     /*
> +     * FIXME should also account for plane ratio
> +     * once 64bpp pixel formats are supported.
> +     */
> +
> +     if (linkrate == DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_2160 ||
> +         linkrate == DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_1080) {
> +             /* vco 8640 */
> +             if (max_pixclk > 540000)
> +                     cdclk = 617140;
> +             else if (max_pixclk > 432000)
> +                     cdclk = 540000;
> +             else if (max_pixclk > 308570)
> +                     cdclk = 432000;
> +             else
> +                     cdclk = 308570;
> +     }
> +     else {
> +             /* VCO 8100 */
> +             if (max_pixclk > 540000)
> +                     cdclk = 675000;
> +             else if (max_pixclk > 450000)
> +                     cdclk = 540000;
> +             else if (max_pixclk > 337500)
> +                     cdclk = 450000;
> +             else
> +                     cdclk = 337500;
> +     }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * FIXME move the cdclk caclulation to
> +      * compute_config() so we can fail gracefully.
> +      */
> +     if (cdclk > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
> +             DRM_ERROR("requested cdclk (%d kHz) exceeds max (%d kHz)\n",
> +                       cdclk, dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq);
> +             cdclk = dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq;
> +     }
> +
> +     to_intel_atomic_state(state)->cdclk = cdclk;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void skl_modeset_commit_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *old_state)
> +{
> +     struct drm_device *dev = old_state->dev;
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +     unsigned int req_cdclk = to_intel_atomic_state(old_state)->cdclk;
> +
> +     skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, req_cdclk);
> +}
> +
>  static int haswell_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>                                     struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> @@ -14831,6 +14894,11 @@ static void intel_init_display(struct drm_device 
> *dev)
>                       broxton_modeset_commit_cdclk;
>               dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk =
>                       broxton_modeset_calc_cdclk;
> +     } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev)) {
> +             dev_priv->display.modeset_commit_cdclk =
> +                     skl_modeset_commit_cdclk;
> +             dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk =
> +                     skl_modeset_calc_cdclk;
>       }
>  
>       switch (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen) {
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to