On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 01:26:40PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:21:44PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > For DSI, the pre_pll_enable and the pre_enable hooks are called
>> > back-to-back on all platforms that support DSI. The distinction is
>> > artificial for DSI, for which we enable the DSI PLL in the encoder
>> > hooks. Do everything in pre_enable, and remove DSI pre_pll_enable hook.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
>> 
>> I was eyeing this same thing at some point.
>> 
>> For the series:
>> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Yeah, all the pretties in here!
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
>
> Btw about bxt dsi I wonder whether we should partially merge this with the
> cpu transcoder (since it's only either that or a dsi encoder aparrently).
> At least I remember that we still had some issues with bxt's
> dsi_get_hw_state?

One step at a time, maybe as a follow-up. I'm kind of hesitant to
conflate this with cpu transcoder, in case some new platform changes the
rules.

So for now, I've pushed this to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks for the
reviews.

BR,
Jani.


>
> Cheers, Daniel
>
>> 
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 16 +++++-----------
>> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c 
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> > index efb5a27dd49c..08c46c49c481 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> > @@ -462,6 +462,8 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable(struct intel_encoder 
>> > *encoder)
>> >    intel_panel_enable_backlight(intel_dsi->attached_connector);
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > +static void intel_dsi_prepare(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder);
>> > +
>> >  static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> >  {
>> >    struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>> > @@ -474,6 +476,9 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder 
>> > *encoder)
>> >  
>> >    DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>> >  
>> > +  intel_dsi_prepare(encoder);
>> > +  intel_enable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>> > +
>> >    /* Panel Enable over CRC PMIC */
>> >    if (intel_dsi->gpio_panel)
>> >            gpiod_set_value_cansleep(intel_dsi->gpio_panel, 1);
>> > @@ -1026,15 +1031,6 @@ static void intel_dsi_prepare(struct intel_encoder 
>> > *intel_encoder)
>> >    }
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > -static void intel_dsi_pre_pll_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> > -{
>> > -  DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>> > -
>> > -  intel_dsi_prepare(encoder);
>> > -  intel_enable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>> > -
>> > -}
>> > -
>> >  static enum drm_connector_status
>> >  intel_dsi_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
>> >  {
>> > @@ -1154,9 +1150,7 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>> >  
>> >    drm_encoder_init(dev, encoder, &intel_dsi_funcs, DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DSI);
>> >  
>> > -  /* XXX: very likely not all of these are needed */
>> >    intel_encoder->compute_config = intel_dsi_compute_config;
>> > -  intel_encoder->pre_pll_enable = intel_dsi_pre_pll_enable;
>> >    intel_encoder->pre_enable = intel_dsi_pre_enable;
>> >    intel_encoder->enable = intel_dsi_enable_nop;
>> >    intel_encoder->disable = intel_dsi_pre_disable;
>> > -- 
>> > 2.1.4
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ville Syrjälä
>> Intel OTC
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to