On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 06:12:47PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > This patch adds a reverse mapping from a digital port number to > intel_encoder object containing the corresponding intel_digital_port. > It simplifies the query of the encoder a lot. > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de> > --- > v2->v3: > * Squashed previously two cleanup patches to a single patch > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c | 39 > +++++++++++--------------------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 2 ++ > 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > index 15c6dc0b4f37..9dbc143cac27 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > @@ -1944,6 +1944,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private { > /* perform PHY state sanity checks? */ > bool chv_phy_assert[2]; > > + struct intel_encoder *dig_port_map[I915_MAX_PORTS]; > + > /* > * NOTE: This is the dri1/ums dungeon, don't add stuff here. Your patch > * will be rejected. Instead look for a better place. > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c > index eeac9f763110..05f08b445dd6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c > @@ -636,13 +636,11 @@ static int i915_audio_component_sync_audio_rate(struct > device *dev, > int port, int rate) > { > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev_to_i915(dev); > - struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_priv->dev; > struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder; > - struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port; > struct intel_crtc *crtc; > struct drm_display_mode *mode; > struct i915_audio_component *acomp = dev_priv->audio_component; > - enum pipe pipe = -1; > + enum pipe pipe = INVALID_PIPE; > u32 tmp; > int n; > > @@ -655,21 +653,12 @@ static int i915_audio_component_sync_audio_rate(struct > device *dev, > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->av_mutex); > /* 1. get the pipe */ > - for_each_intel_encoder(drm_dev, intel_encoder) { > - if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI) > - continue; > - intel_dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(&intel_encoder->base); > - if (port == intel_dig_port->port) { > - crtc = to_intel_crtc(intel_encoder->base.crtc); > - if (!crtc) { > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: crtc is NULL\n", __func__); > - continue; > - } > - pipe = crtc->pipe; > - break; > - } > + intel_encoder = dev_priv->dig_port_map[port]; > + if (intel_encoder && intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI &&
Is it really legit to call these functions with a port for which we don't have an encoder? WARN_ON(!encoder) here and in the other places? Or would that require some function for snd-hda to inquire i915 which ports are enabled (which we probably should have to avoid registering audio ports that aren't there)? Otherwise lgtm. -Daniel > + intel_encoder->base.crtc) { > + crtc = to_intel_crtc(intel_encoder->base.crtc); > + pipe = crtc->pipe; > } > - > if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE) { > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("no pipe for the port %c\n", port_name(port)); > mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->av_mutex); > @@ -716,27 +705,21 @@ static int i915_audio_component_get_eld(struct device > *dev, int port, > unsigned char *buf, int max_bytes) > { > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev_to_i915(dev); > - struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_priv->dev; > struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder; > struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port; > const u8 *eld; > int ret = -EINVAL; > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->av_mutex); > - for_each_intel_encoder(drm_dev, intel_encoder) { > - if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT && > - intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI) > - continue; > + intel_encoder = dev_priv->dig_port_map[port]; > + if (intel_encoder) { > + ret = 0; > intel_dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(&intel_encoder->base); > - if (port == intel_dig_port->port) { > - ret = 0; > - *enabled = intel_dig_port->audio_connector != NULL; > - if (!*enabled) > - break; > + *enabled = intel_dig_port->audio_connector != NULL; > + if (*enabled) { > eld = intel_dig_port->audio_connector->eld; > ret = drm_eld_size(eld); > memcpy(buf, eld, min(max_bytes, ret)); > - break; > } > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > index 76ce7c2960b6..59deb0d85533 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > @@ -3295,6 +3295,7 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_device *dev, enum port > port) > intel_encoder->get_config = intel_ddi_get_config; > > intel_dig_port->port = port; > + dev_priv->dig_port_map[port] = intel_encoder; > intel_dig_port->saved_port_bits = I915_READ(DDI_BUF_CTL(port)) & > (DDI_BUF_PORT_REVERSAL | > DDI_A_4_LANES); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > index bec443a629da..146f5da3acb1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > @@ -6002,6 +6002,7 @@ intel_dp_init(struct drm_device *dev, > } > > intel_dig_port->port = port; > + dev_priv->dig_port_map[port] = intel_encoder; > intel_dig_port->dp.output_reg = output_reg; > > intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c > index bdd462e7c690..c046017be786 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c > @@ -2148,6 +2148,7 @@ void intel_hdmi_init_connector(struct > intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, > void intel_hdmi_init(struct drm_device *dev, > i915_reg_t hdmi_reg, enum port port) > { > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port; > struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder; > struct intel_connector *intel_connector; > @@ -2216,6 +2217,7 @@ void intel_hdmi_init(struct drm_device *dev, > intel_encoder->cloneable |= 1 << INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI; > > intel_dig_port->port = port; > + dev_priv->dig_port_map[port] = intel_encoder; > intel_dig_port->hdmi.hdmi_reg = hdmi_reg; > intel_dig_port->dp.output_reg = INVALID_MMIO_REG; > > -- > 2.6.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx