In order to ensure seqno/irq coherency, we current read a ring register.
We are not sure quite how it works, only that is does. Experiments show
that e.g. doing a clflush(seqno) instead is not sufficient, but we can
remove the forcewake dance from the mmio access.
v2: Baytrail wants a clflush too.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 6cecc15ec01b..69dd69e46fa9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1490,10 +1490,21 @@ gen6_ring_get_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, bool
lazy_coherency)
{
/* Workaround to force correct ordering between irq and seqno writes on
* ivb (and maybe also on snb) by reading from a CS register (like
- * ACTHD) before reading the status page. */
+ * ACTHD) before reading the status page.
+ *
+ * Note that this effectively effectively stalls the read by the time
+ * it takes to do a memory transaction, which more or less ensures
+ * that the write from the GPU has sufficient time to invalidate
+ * the CPU cacheline. Alternatively we could delay the interrupt from
+ * the CS ring to give the write time to land, but that would incur
+ * a delay after every batch i.e. much more frequent than a delay
+ * when waiting for the interrupt (with the same net latency).
+ */
if (!lazy_coherency) {
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
- POSTING_READ(RING_ACTHD(ring->mmio_base));
+ POSTING_READ_FW(RING_ACTHD(ring->mmio_base));
+
+ intel_flush_status_page(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX);
}
return intel_read_status_page(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX);
--
2.6.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
