On 21/12/15 08:11, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
On pe, 2015-12-18 at 16:18 +0000, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 18/12/15 12:27, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Take advantage of WARN return value to simplify the flow.

Cc: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 15 +++++----------
   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 1d28d90..5a5a3e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -87,23 +87,18 @@
    */
   #define I915_STATE_WARN(condition, format...) ({                     
\
        int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);                      
        \
-       if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) {                          
        \
-               if (i915.verbose_state_checks)                  
        \
-                       WARN(1, format);                                
\
-               else                                            
        \
+       if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on))                            
        \
+               if (!WARN(i915.verbose_state_checks, format))   
        \
                        DRM_ERROR(format);                      
        \
-       }                                                               
\
        unlikely(__ret_warn_on);                                        
\
   })

   #define I915_STATE_WARN_ON(condition) ({                             
\
        int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);                      
        \
-       if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) {                          
        \
-               if (i915.verbose_state_checks)                  
        \
-                       WARN(1, "WARN_ON(" #condition ")\n");       
        \
-               else                                            
        \
+       if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on))                            
        \
+               if (!WARN(i915.verbose_state_checks,            
        \
+                         "WARN_ON(" #condition ")\n"))             
        \
                        DRM_ERROR("WARN_ON(" #condition ")\n");     
        \

These last two lines still have the text of the condition as part of
a
format string :(

For compile-testing, you might want to change:

    static void lpt_bend_clkout_dp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv
    ...
      if (WARN_ON(steps % 5 != 0))
        return;

to use I915_STATE_WARN_ON() instead of WARN_ON, then you should get a
compile-time warning if the '%' ends up in the format string.


This is just a patch to convert the old macros to different order
before changing them. The way of constructing the strings is intact.

Regards, Joonas

Yes, I agree, you didn't break them -- they were already wrong!

.Dave.

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to