We don't need to incur the overhead of checking whether the object is
pinned prior to changing its madvise. If the object is pinned, the
madvise will not take effect until it is unpinned and so we cannot free
the pages being pointed at by hardware. Marking a pinned object with
allocated pages as DONTNEED will not trigger any undue warnings. The check
is therefore superfluous, and by removing it we can remove a linear walk
over all the vma the object has.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index f87e558a7233..24e6e4773ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3631,11 +3631,6 @@ i915_gem_madvise_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
*data,
                goto unlock;
        }
 
-       if (i915_gem_obj_is_pinned(obj)) {
-               ret = -EINVAL;
-               goto out;
-       }
-
        if (obj->pages &&
            obj->tiling_mode != I915_TILING_NONE &&
            dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_PIN_SWIZZLED_PAGES) {
@@ -3654,7 +3649,6 @@ i915_gem_madvise_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 
        args->retained = obj->madv != __I915_MADV_PURGED;
 
-out:
        drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
 unlock:
        mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-- 
2.7.0.rc3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to