On 11/01/16 09:17, Chris Wilson wrote:
Given that the intel_lr_context_pin cannot succeed without the object,
we cannot reach intel_lr_context_unpin() without first allocating that
object - so we can remove the redundant test.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 84a8bcc90d78..0f0bf97e4032 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -769,17 +769,14 @@ static int intel_lr_context_pin(struct
drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
void intel_lr_context_unpin(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
{
int engine = rq->engine->id;
- struct drm_i915_gem_object *ctx_obj = rq->ctx->engine[engine].state;
- struct intel_ring *ring = rq->ring;
-
- if (ctx_obj) {
- WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&rq->i915->dev->struct_mutex));
- if (--rq->ctx->engine[engine].pin_count == 0) {
- intel_ring_unmap(ring);
- i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ctx_obj);
- i915_gem_context_unreference(rq->ctx);
- }
- }
+
+ WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&rq->i915->dev->struct_mutex));
+ if (--rq->ctx->engine[engine].pin_count)
+ return;
+
+ intel_ring_unmap(rq->ring);
+ i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(rq->ctx->engine[engine].state);
+ i915_gem_context_unreference(rq->ctx);
}
static int intel_logical_ring_workarounds_emit(struct drm_i915_gem_request
*req)
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
There is another ctx_obj check in intel_execlists_retire_requests which
could go.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
