Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:05:06PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>> > -  intel_ring_emit(ring, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(4) | PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE |
>> > -                  PIPE_CONTROL_WRITE_FLUSH |
>> > -                  PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE);
>> > -  intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->scratch.gtt_offset | 
>> > PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT);
>> > -  intel_ring_emit(ring, i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req));
>> > +  intel_ring_emit(ring,
>> > +                  GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(4) |
>> > +                  PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE |
>> > +                  PIPE_CONTROL_WRITE_FLUSH);
>> 
>> Why no more PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE?
>
> I opened vim to add it back in and I coulnd't bring myself to commit
> that attrocity.

I just noticed the asymmetry. Ilk doesn't need it?

-Mika

> -Chris
>
> -- 
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to