On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:54:55PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > If we move the release of the GEM request (i.e. decoupling it from the > various lists used for client and context tracking) after it is complete > (either by the GPU retiring the request, or by the caller cancelling the > request), we can remove the requirement that the final unreference of > the GEM request need to be under the struct_mutex. > > v2: Execlists as always is badly asymetric and year old patches still > haven't landed to fix it up. > > v3: Extracted, rebased and fixed for GuC. (Tvrtko Ursulin)
After you mentioned the unbalanced, the patches I reordered to fix that are: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=tasklet&id=83dcde26caa26f4113c3e441c3c96c504fd88e13 https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=tasklet&id=9f386a21d3f28db763102b5c4f97a90bd0dcfd08 https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=tasklet&id=9afd878e2c9f7825b99dc839c7b5deb553b62e32 https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=tasklet&id=a842a2b0b7e90148966f35488209c969a9a9da54 -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
