On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:05:06AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Not sure about intel_display because that's an ever-growing dumping ground > and with atomic still in-flight I definitely don't want to upset this. > There's been various plans to split it up a bit (and document while at > it). Maybe we could throw in refactorings likes this too.
The other problem with intel_display is that it is more interwined with the drm core, so we do not such a predominant pointer class. Inside GEM, the last remaining bastion is dev->struct_mutex, and we can even move that to i915->global_mutex and start whittling away at it now. -Chirs -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
