On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:53:03PM +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote: > This allows us to avoid the situation where worker is increasing the GPU > frequency after we've switched to idle. > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89728 > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > index f0d9414..bb5b557 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work) > > spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock); > /* Speed up work cancelation during disabling rps interrupts. */ > - if (!dev_priv->rps.interrupts_enabled) { > + if (!dev_priv->rps.interrupts_enabled || !dev_priv->mm.busy) {
And ->mm.busy is really protected by ->irq_lock? You're sure? -Daniel > spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock); > return; > } > -- > 2.8.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
