On ke, 2016-07-20 at 14:12 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If we rewrite the I915_WRITE_TAIL specialisation for the legacy
> ringbuffer as submitting the request onto the ringbuffer, we can unify
> the vfunc with both execlists and GuC in the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 7 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 52
> ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> index 2153b4fe4a1f..408f390a4c98 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> @@ -469,13 +469,10 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request
> *request,
> */
> request->postfix = intel_ring_get_tail(ring);
>
> - if (i915.enable_execlists) {
> + if (i915.enable_execlists)
> ret = engine->emit_request(request);
> - } else {
> + else
> ret = engine->add_request(request);
> -
> - request->tail = intel_ring_get_tail(ring);
> - }
> /* Not allowed to fail! */
> WARN(ret, "emit|add_request failed: %d!\n", ret);
> /* Sanity check that the reserved size was large enough. */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 4488db485fa4..43dfa4be1cfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -58,14 +58,6 @@ void intel_ring_update_space(struct intel_ring *ring)
> ring->tail, ring->size);
> }
>
> -static void __intel_engine_submit(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> -{
> - struct intel_ring *ring = engine->buffer;
> -
> - ring->tail &= ring->size - 1;
> - engine->write_tail(engine, ring->tail);
> -}
> -
> static int
> gen2_render_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> u32 invalidate_domains,
> @@ -421,13 +413,6 @@ gen8_render_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> return gen8_emit_pipe_control(req, flags, scratch_addr);
> }
>
> -static void ring_write_tail(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> - u32 value)
> -{
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
> - I915_WRITE_TAIL(engine, value);
> -}
> -
> u64 intel_engine_get_active_head(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
> @@ -541,7 +526,7 @@ static bool stop_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>
> I915_WRITE_CTL(engine, 0);
> I915_WRITE_HEAD(engine, 0);
> - engine->write_tail(engine, 0);
> + I915_WRITE_TAIL(engine, 0);
>
> if (!IS_GEN2(dev_priv)) {
> (void)I915_READ_CTL(engine);
> @@ -1467,7 +1452,11 @@ gen6_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> intel_ring_emit(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX << MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, req->fence.seqno);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_USER_INTERRUPT);
> - __intel_engine_submit(req->engine);
> + intel_ring_advance(ring);
> +
> + req->tail = intel_ring_get_tail(ring);
I'd just do req->tail = ring->tail and drop the intel_ring_get_tail()
function completely at the most convenient spot which might be around
now before you add some more, currently we only have 5 uses.
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
> +
> + req->engine->submit_request(req);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1497,7 +1486,8 @@ gen8_render_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request
> *req)
> intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_USER_INTERRUPT);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
> - __intel_engine_submit(engine);
> +
> + req->engine->submit_request(req);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1716,11 +1706,22 @@ i9xx_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> intel_ring_emit(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX << MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, req->fence.seqno);
> intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_USER_INTERRUPT);
> - __intel_engine_submit(req->engine);
> + intel_ring_advance(ring);
> +
> + req->tail = intel_ring_get_tail(ring);
> +
> + req->engine->submit_request(req);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void i9xx_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = request->i915;
> +
> + I915_WRITE_TAIL(request->engine, request->tail);
> +}
> +
> static void
> gen6_irq_enable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> @@ -2479,10 +2480,9 @@ void intel_engine_init_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine, u32 seqno)
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> -static void gen6_bsd_ring_write_tail(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> - u32 value)
> +static void gen6_bsd_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = request->i915;
>
> intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>
> @@ -2506,8 +2506,8 @@ static void gen6_bsd_ring_write_tail(struct
> intel_engine_cs *engine,
> DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for the BSD ring to wake up\n");
>
> /* Now that the ring is fully powered up, update the tail */
> - I915_WRITE_FW(RING_TAIL(engine->mmio_base), value);
> - POSTING_READ_FW(RING_TAIL(engine->mmio_base));
> + I915_WRITE_FW(RING_TAIL(request->engine->mmio_base), request->tail);
> + POSTING_READ_FW(RING_TAIL(request->engine->mmio_base));
>
> /* Let the ring send IDLE messages to the GT again,
> * and so let it sleep to conserve power when idle.
> @@ -2813,7 +2813,7 @@ static void intel_ring_default_vfuncs(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> engine->init_hw = init_ring_common;
> - engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
> + engine->submit_request = i9xx_submit_request;
>
> engine->add_request = i9xx_add_request;
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6)
> @@ -2897,7 +2897,7 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine)
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6) {
> /* gen6 bsd needs a special wa for tail updates */
> if (IS_GEN6(dev_priv))
> - engine->write_tail = gen6_bsd_ring_write_tail;
> + engine->submit_request = gen6_bsd_submit_request;
> engine->emit_flush = gen6_bsd_ring_flush;
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 8)
> engine->irq_enable_mask = GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 85d6a70554b9..1a38c383327e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -204,8 +204,6 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
>
> int (*init_context)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req);
>
> - void (*write_tail)(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> - u32 value);
> int (*add_request)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req);
> /* Some chipsets are not quite as coherent as advertised and need
> * an expensive kick to force a true read of the up-to-date seqno.
> @@ -294,6 +292,7 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
> #define I915_DISPATCH_SECURE 0x1
> #define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2
> #define I915_DISPATCH_RS 0x4
> + void (*submit_request)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req);
>
> /**
> * List of objects currently involved in rendering from the
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
