On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, David Weinehall <david.weineh...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 04:09:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:18:15PM +0530, Kamble, Sagar A wrote:
>> > Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com
>> > <mailto:sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>>
>> 
>> You're mailer wreaks havoc with your reviewed-by tags. Pleas fix this.
>> 
>> 
>> > On 6/27/2016 8:10 PM, akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
>> > > From: Akash Goel <akash.g...@intel.com>
>> > > 
>> > > Updated the i915_drpc_info debugfs with coarse power gating & forcewake
>> > > info for Gen9.
>> > > 
>> > > v2: Change all IS_GEN9() by gen >= 9 (Damien)
>
> For future reference, please use IS_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 for expressions
> such as this. My bad for not spotting this until the patch got merged.
> Fret not, however, I've got a few patches that'll clean this up :)

David means INTEL_GEN(), not IS_GEN(). ;)

BR,
Jani.

>
>
> Regards, David Weinehall
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to