On ti, 2016-08-09 at 11:46 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:39:02PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > 
> > On su, 2016-08-07 at 15:45 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > @@ -5327,7 +5320,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list 
> > > i915_debugfs_list[] = {
> > >   {"i915_capabilities", i915_capabilities, 0},
> > >   {"i915_gem_objects", i915_gem_object_info, 0},
> > >   {"i915_gem_gtt", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0},
> > > - {"i915_gem_pinned", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0, (void *) PINNED_LIST},
> > > + {"i915_gem_pinned", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0, 0},
> > "i915_gem_pin_display" then? Otherwise it's a fragile change.
> Sure. Sold with that change?

Also remove the "i915_gem_gtt", alias and rename the function
appropriately, with those;

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>

> -Chris
> 
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to