Hi Tom, [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc3 next-20160819] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on] [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sagar-Arun-Kamble/drm-i915-slpc-If-using-SLPC-do-not-set-frequency/20160821-142010 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next config: x86_64-rhel (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function 'intel_set_rps': >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4944:6: error: implicit declaration of >> function 'intel_slpc_active' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] if (intel_slpc_active(dev_priv)) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/intel_slpc_active +4944 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c 4938 } 4939 spin_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.client_lock); 4940 } 4941 4942 void intel_set_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val) 4943 { > 4944 if (intel_slpc_active(dev_priv)) 4945 return; 4946 4947 if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
.config.gz
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
