On 9/9/2016 10:44 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:37PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
+       if (!intel_slpc_active(dev_priv))
+               return -ENODEV;
Can we really say slpc is active without an slpc.vma?
No. Will remove this check.
-Chris


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to