On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:55:21 -0700 Alexander Duyck wrote: > It would make more sense to just add it as a variant hash function of > toeplitz. If you did it right you could probably make the formatting > pretty, something like: > RSS hash function: > toeplitz: on > symmetric xor: on > xor: off > crc32: off > > It doesn't make sense to place it in the input flags and will just > cause quick congestion as things get added there. This is an algorithm > change so it makes more sense to place it there.
Algo is also a bit confusing, it's more like key pre-processing? There's nothing toeplitz about xoring input fields. Works as well for CRC32.. or XOR. We can use one of the reserved fields of struct ethtool_rxfh to carry this extension. I think I asked for this at some point, but there's only so much repeated feedback one can send in a day :( _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
