bitmap_set_bits() does not start with the FS' prefix and may collide
with a new generic helper one day. It operates with the FS-specific
types, so there's no change those two could do the same thing.
Just add the prefix to exclude such possible conflict.

Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kits...@intel.com>
Acked-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <yury.no...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.loba...@intel.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
index c8a05d5eb9cb..3ab8dea5036b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -1911,9 +1911,9 @@ static inline void bitmap_clear_bits(struct 
btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
                ctl->free_space -= bytes;
 }
 
-static void bitmap_set_bits(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
-                           struct btrfs_free_space *info, u64 offset,
-                           u64 bytes)
+static void btrfs_bitmap_set_bits(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
+                                 struct btrfs_free_space *info, u64 offset,
+                                 u64 bytes)
 {
        unsigned long start, count, end;
        int extent_delta = 1;
@@ -2249,7 +2249,7 @@ static u64 add_bytes_to_bitmap(struct 
btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
 
        bytes_to_set = min(end - offset, bytes);
 
-       bitmap_set_bits(ctl, info, offset, bytes_to_set);
+       btrfs_bitmap_set_bits(ctl, info, offset, bytes_to_set);
 
        return bytes_to_set;
 
-- 
2.44.0

Reply via email to