On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 01:43:31PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 09:44:33AM +0200, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > It is needed because subfunction port representor shouldn't configure
> > the source VSI during representor creation.
> >
> > Move the code to separate function and call it only in case the VF port
> > representor is being created.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkow...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Hi Michal,
>
> The nit below notwithstanding, this looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <ho...@kernel.org>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c | 55 ++++++++++++++------
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.h | 10 ++++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_repr.c | 7 +++
> > 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c
> > index 7b57a6561a5a..3f73f46111fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c
> > @@ -117,17 +117,10 @@ static int ice_eswitch_setup_repr(struct ice_pf *pf,
> > struct ice_repr *repr)
> > struct ice_vsi *vsi = repr->src_vsi;
> > struct metadata_dst *dst;
> >
> > - ice_remove_vsi_fltr(&pf->hw, vsi->idx);
> > repr->dst = metadata_dst_alloc(0, METADATA_HW_PORT_MUX,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!repr->dst)
> > - goto err_add_mac_fltr;
> > -
> > - if (ice_vsi_update_security(vsi, ice_vsi_ctx_clear_antispoof))
> > - goto err_dst_free;
> > -
> > - if (ice_vsi_add_vlan_zero(vsi))
> > - goto err_update_security;
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > netif_keep_dst(uplink_vsi->netdev);
> >
> > @@ -136,16 +129,48 @@ static int ice_eswitch_setup_repr(struct ice_pf *pf,
> > struct ice_repr *repr)
> > dst->u.port_info.lower_dev = uplink_vsi->netdev;
> >
> > return 0;
> > +}
> >
> > -err_update_security:
> > +/**
> > + * ice_eswitch_cfg_vsi - configure VSI to work in slow-path
> > + * @vsi: VSI structure of representee
> > + * @mac: representee MAC
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, non-zero on error.
> > + */
> > +int ice_eswitch_cfg_vsi(struct ice_vsi *vsi, const u8 *mac)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + ice_remove_vsi_fltr(&vsi->back->hw, vsi->idx);
> > +
> > + err = ice_vsi_update_security(vsi, ice_vsi_ctx_clear_antispoof);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_update_security;
> > +
> > + err = ice_vsi_add_vlan_zero(vsi);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_vlan_zero;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_vlan_zero:
> > ice_vsi_update_security(vsi, ice_vsi_ctx_set_antispoof);
>
> nit: Please consider continuing the practice, that is used for the labels
> removed by this patch, of naming labels after what they do rather
> than what jumps to them.
>
Ok, I was wondering which approach is better. Probably mixing both is
the worst. I will follow your advice next time, thanks.
> > -err_dst_free:
> > - metadata_dst_free(repr->dst);
> > - repr->dst = NULL;
> > -err_add_mac_fltr:
> > - ice_fltr_add_mac_and_broadcast(vsi, repr->parent_mac, ICE_FWD_TO_VSI);
> > +err_update_security:
> > + ice_fltr_add_mac_and_broadcast(vsi, mac, ICE_FWD_TO_VSI);
> >
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
>
> ...
