On 7/24/2024 9:48 AM, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> After XDP configuration is completed, we bring the interface up
> unconditionally, regardless of its state before the call to .ndo_bpf().
>
> Preserve the information whether the interface had to be brought down and
> later bring it up only in such case.
>
> Fixes: efc2214b6047 ("ice: Add support for XDP")
> Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.dre...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zare...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> index d7cc641643f8..d83cde431fa5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> @@ -3000,8 +3000,8 @@ ice_xdp_setup_prog(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct bpf_prog
> *prog,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> unsigned int frame_size = vsi->netdev->mtu + ICE_ETH_PKT_HDR_PAD;
> - bool if_running = netif_running(vsi->netdev);
> int ret = 0, xdp_ring_err = 0;
> + bool if_running;
>
> if (prog && !prog->aux->xdp_has_frags) {
> if (frame_size > ice_max_xdp_frame_size(vsi)) {
> @@ -3018,8 +3018,11 @@ ice_xdp_setup_prog(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct
> bpf_prog *prog,
> return 0;
> }
>
> + if_running = netif_running(vsi->netdev) &&
> + !test_and_set_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state);
> +
> /* need to stop netdev while setting up the program for Rx rings */
> - if (if_running && !test_and_set_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state)) {
> + if (if_running) {
> ret = ice_down(vsi);
> if (ret) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Preparing device for XDP
> attach failed");
This diff lacks the appropriate context that can help explain how it works:
>
> if (if_running)
> ret = ice_up(vsi);
>
> if (!ret && prog)
> ice_vsi_rx_napi_schedule(vsi);
>
> return (ret || xdp_ring_err) ? -ENOMEM : 0;
By changing if_running to include the VSI state flag, we ensure the call
to ice_up is correctly conditional.
Good fix. If I understand right, it depends on the other synchronization
fixes to work correctly so that the VSI state won't be changed on us.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>