On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 03:35:54PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: [...] > napi_struct is the only generic struct whichs size is hardcoded in the > macros (struct dim is already sizeof()ed, as well as cpumask_var_t), so > I'm fine with the change you proposed in your first RFC -- I mean > > libeth_cacheline_set_assert(struct idpf_q_vector, 112, > - 424 + 2 * sizeof(struct dim), > + 24 + sizeof(struct napi_struct) + > + 2 * sizeof(struct dim), > 8 + sizeof(cpumask_var_t));
So you are saying to drop the other #defines I added in the RFC and just embed a sizeof? I just want to be clear so that I send a v2 that'll be correct.
