> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 12:21 PM
> To: Loktionov, Aleksandr <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alok Tiwari <[email protected]>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <[email protected]>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ixgbe: fix typo in
> function comment for ixgbe_get_num_per_func()
>
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 07:52:13PM +0000, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On
> Behalf
> > > Of Alok Tiwari
> > > Sent: Friday, September 5, 2025 6:34 PM
> > > To: Nguyen, Anthony L <[email protected]>; Kitszel,
> > > Przemyslaw <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] ixgbe: fix typo in
> > > function comment for ixgbe_get_num_per_func()
> > >
> > > Correct a typo in the comment where "PH" was used instead of "PF".
> > > The function returns the number of resources per PF or 0 if no PFs
> > > are available.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <[email protected]>
>
> Hi Aleksandr,
>
> Perhaps I need more coffee.
> But it's unclear to me why you responded to the above with the patch
> below.
>
My mistake, wrong copy-paste.
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <[email protected]>
