> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> Jedrzej Jagielski
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2025 11:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Jagielski, Jedrzej
> <[email protected]>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <[email protected]>; Loktionov, Aleksandr
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 1/4] ixgbevf: fix getting link 
> speed
> data for E610 devices
> 
> E610 adapters no longer use the VFLINKS register to read PF's link speed and
> linkup state. As a result VF driver cannot get actual link state and it 
> incorrectly
> reports 10G which is the default option.
> It leads to a situation where even 1G adapters print 10G as actual link speed.
> The same happens when PF driver set speed different than 10G.
> 
> Add new mailbox operation to let the VF driver request a PF driver to provide
> actual link data. Update the mailbox api to v1.6.
> 
> Incorporate both ways of getting link status within the legacy
> ixgbe_check_mac_link_vf() function.
> 
> Fixes: 4c44b450c69b ("ixgbevf: Add support for Intel(R) E610 device")
> Co-developed-by: Andrzej Wilczynski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Wilczynski <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Jedrzej Jagielski <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/defines.h  |   1 +
>  .../net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c |   6 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/mbx.h      |   4 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/vf.c       | 137 ++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/defines.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/defines.h
> index a9bc96f6399d..e177d1d58696 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/defines.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/defines.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@


Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <[email protected]>


Reply via email to