> -----Original Message----- > From: Joshi, Sreedevi <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2025 12:59 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; Joshi, Sreedevi <[email protected]>; > Loktionov, Aleksandr <[email protected]>; Kitszel, > Przemyslaw <[email protected]> > Subject: [PATCH iwl-next] idpf: remove duplicate defines in IDPF_CAP_RSS > Fixed inline.
> Remove duplicate defines from the OR operation when defining IDPF_CAP_RSS. > > Duplicate definitions were introduced when IDPF_CAP_RSS was originally > defined and were left behind and went unnoticed during a previous commit > that renamed them. Review of the original out-of-tree code confirms these > duplicates were the result of a typing error. > > Remove the duplicates to clean up the code and avoid potential confusion. > Also verify no other duplicate occurrences of these defines exist > elsewhere in the codebase. > > Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Sreedevi Joshi <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h > index 0f320a2b92d2..21c50695348c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h > @@ -732,13 +732,11 @@ static inline bool idpf_is_rdma_cap_ena(struct > idpf_adapter *adapter) > } > > #define IDPF_CAP_RSS (\ > - VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV4_TCP |\ > VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV4_TCP |\ > VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV4_UDP |\ > VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV4_SCTP |\ > VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV4_OTHER |\ > VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV6_TCP |\ > - VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV6_TCP |\ > VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV6_UDP |\ > VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV6_SCTP |\ > VIRTCHNL2_FLOW_IPV6_OTHER) > -- > 2.25.1 Patch is meant for iwl-next. Missed specifying that on the subject line. Fixed now. Thanks Sreedevi
