Hello Alex, On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 06:48:08AM +0000, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf > > Of Breno Leitao > > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2025 7:19 PM > > To: Lobakin, Aleksander <[email protected]>; Nguyen, > > Anthony L <[email protected]>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw > > <[email protected]>; Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>; > > David S. Miller <[email protected]>; Eric Dumazet > > <[email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>; Paolo Abeni > > <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > Fijalkowski, Maciej <[email protected]>; intel-wired- > > [email protected]; [email protected]; linux- > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Breno Leitao > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 4/8] idpf: extract GRXRINGS > > from .get_rxnfc > > > > Commit 84eaf4359c36 ("net: ethtool: add get_rx_ring_count callback to > > optimize RX ring queries") added specific support for GRXRINGS > > callback, simplifying .get_rxnfc. > > > > Remove the handling of GRXRINGS in .get_rxnfc() by moving it to the > > new .get_rx_ring_count(). > > > > This simplifies the RX ring count retrieval and aligns idpf with the > > new ethtool API for querying RX ring parameters. > > > > I was not totatly convinced I needed to have the lock, but, I decided > > totatly -> totally
Good catch, I will update and respin with your "Signed-off-by". Thanks for the review, --breno
