On 09/01/2026 15:11, Ivan Vecera wrote: >>>> + Common properties for devices that require connection to DPLL >>>> (Digital Phase >>>> + Locked Loop) pins for frequency synchronization (e.g. SyncE). >>>> + >>>> +properties: >>>> + dpll-pins: >>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array >>>> + description: >>>> + List of phandles to the DPLL pin nodes connected to this device. >>>> + >>>> + dpll-pin-names: >>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array >>>> + description: >>>> + Names for the DPLL pins defined in 'dpll-pins', in the same >>>> order. >>>> + >>>> +dependencies: >>>> + dpll-pin-names: [ dpll-pins ] >>> >>> Binding should go to dtschema. See also commit >>> 3282a891060aace02e3eed4789739768060cea32 in dtschema or other examples >>> how to add new provider/consumer properties. > > Quick questions... if the dpll pin consumer properties schema should go > to dtschema... > > 1) Should I remove this patch from this series? So this schema won't be > a part of kernel
Yes. > 2) dtschema does not contain dpll-device and dpll-pin schemas now, I The provider, so the #foo-cells should be in dtschema as well. > expect they should be added as well... or? I'm asking because there > is also e.g. hwlock-consumer.yaml in dtschema but no hwlock hwlock-cells are missing, probably due to licensing. Best regards, Krzysztof
