> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf
> Of Brian Vazquez via Intel-wired-lan
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 9:41 PM
> To: Brian Vazquez <[email protected]>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <[email protected]>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <[email protected]>; David S. Miller <[email protected]>;
> Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>;
> Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Cc: David Decotigny <[email protected]>; Li Li <[email protected]>;
> Singhai, Anjali <[email protected]>; Samudrala, Sridhar
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Tantilov, Emil S <[email protected]>;
> Brian Vazquez <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net PATCH] idpf: change IRQ naming to
> match netdev and ethtool queue numbering
> 
> The code uses the vidx for the IRQ name but that doesn't match ethtool
> reporting or netdev naming, this makes it hard to tune the device and
> associate queues with IRQs. Sequentially requesting irqs starting from
> '0' makes the output consistent.
> 
> Before:
> 
> ethtool -L eth1 tx 1 combined 3
> 
> grep . /proc/irq/*/*idpf*/../smp_affinity_list
> /proc/irq/67/idpf-Mailbox-0/../smp_affinity_list:0-55,112-167
> /proc/irq/68/idpf-eth1-TxRx-1/../smp_affinity_list:0
> /proc/irq/70/idpf-eth1-TxRx-3/../smp_affinity_list:1
> /proc/irq/71/idpf-eth1-TxRx-4/../smp_affinity_list:2
> /proc/irq/72/idpf-eth1-Tx-5/../smp_affinity_list:3
> 
> ethtool -S eth1 | grep -v ': 0'
> NIC statistics:
>      tx_q-0_pkts: 1002
>      tx_q-1_pkts: 2679
>      tx_q-2_pkts: 1113
>      tx_q-3_pkts: 1192 <----- tx_q-3 vs idpf-eth1-Tx-5
>      rx_q-0_pkts: 1143
>      rx_q-1_pkts: 3172
>      rx_q-2_pkts: 1074
> 
> After:
> 
> ethtool -L eth1 tx 1 combined 3
> 
> grep . /proc/irq/*/*idpf*/../smp_affinity_list
> 
> /proc/irq/67/idpf-Mailbox-0/../smp_affinity_list:0-55,112-167
> /proc/irq/68/idpf-eth1-TxRx-0/../smp_affinity_list:0
> /proc/irq/70/idpf-eth1-TxRx-1/../smp_affinity_list:1
> /proc/irq/71/idpf-eth1-TxRx-2/../smp_affinity_list:2
> /proc/irq/72/idpf-eth1-Tx-3/../smp_affinity_list:3
> 
> ethtool -S eth1 | grep -v ': 0'
> NIC statistics:
>      tx_q-0_pkts: 118
>      tx_q-1_pkts: 134
>      tx_q-2_pkts: 228
>      tx_q-3_pkts: 138 <--- tx_q-3 matches idpf-eth1-Tx-3
>      rx_q-0_pkts: 111
>      rx_q-1_pkts: 366
>      rx_q-2_pkts: 120
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index c2a1fe3c79ec..c1f8dfc570ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -4093,7 +4093,7 @@ static int idpf_vport_intr_req_irq(struct
> idpf_vport *vport,
>                       continue;
> 
>               name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s-%s-%d", drv_name,
> if_name,
> -                              vec_name, vidx);
> +                              vec_name, vector);
> 
>               err = request_irq(irq_num, idpf_vport_intr_clean_queues,
> 0,
>                                 name, q_vector);
> --
> 2.52.0.457.g6b5491de43-goog

I think could be nice to have proper Fixes: tag, but anyway.
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <[email protected]>

Reply via email to