On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 16:31:39 -0800, Jacob Keller wrote: > > I see the Fixes: commit exists in only tnguy/next-queue.git, so I'm > > sending this patch to iwl-next, not iwl-net. > > > > Also IIUC dev-queue in tnguy/next-queue.git is rebased continuously, so > > the commit hash will be stale soon, and I don't know how to handle this. > > > > Yea. Including the full subject line should be sufficient for Tony to > find this.
I see :) > > > I'd appreciate it if iwl-folks know the way to handle it. Thanks! > > Ideally we can squash this in with the implementation patches and > include your Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by tags if you would agree > to that? That sounds good, and I agree to do so. If I need to take some actions, please let me know.
