Add likely/unlikely markers for better branch prediction. While touching
some functions, cleanup the code a little bit.

This patch is not supposed to make any logic changes.

Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <[email protected]>
---
 .../net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 29 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
index 4f983e1365eb..f67486e5ef45 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbevf_ring 
*rx_ring,
        u16 ntu = rx_ring->next_to_use;
 
        /* nothing to do or no valid netdev defined */
-       if (!cleaned_count || !rx_ring->netdev)
+       if (unlikely(!cleaned_count || !rx_ring->netdev))
                return;
 
        rx_desc = IXGBEVF_RX_DESC(rx_ring, ntu);
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbevf_ring 
*rx_ring,
 
                rx_desc++;
                ntu++;
-               if (unlikely(ntu == rx_ring->count)) {
+               if (unlikely(ntu == fq.count)) {
                        rx_desc = IXGBEVF_RX_DESC(rx_ring, 0);
                        ntu = 0;
                }
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector 
*q_vector,
 
                rx_desc = IXGBEVF_RX_DESC(rx_ring, rx_ring->next_to_clean);
                size = le16_to_cpu(rx_desc->wb.upper.length);
-               if (!size)
+               if (unlikely(!size))
                        break;
 
                /* This memory barrier is needed to keep us from reading
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector 
*q_vector,
                }
 
                /* exit if we failed to retrieve a buffer */
-               if (!xdp_res && !skb) {
+               if (unlikely(!xdp_res && !skb)) {
                        rx_ring->rx_stats.alloc_rx_buff_failed++;
                        break;
                }
@@ -867,21 +867,19 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector 
*q_vector,
                        continue;
 
                /* verify the packet layout is correct */
-               if (xdp_res || ixgbevf_cleanup_headers(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb)) {
+               if (xdp_res ||
+                   unlikely(ixgbevf_cleanup_headers(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb))) {
                        skb = NULL;
                        continue;
                }
 
-               /* probably a little skewed due to removing CRC */
-               total_rx_bytes += skb->len;
-
                /* Workaround hardware that can't do proper VEPA multicast
                 * source pruning.
                 */
-               if ((skb->pkt_type == PACKET_BROADCAST ||
-                    skb->pkt_type == PACKET_MULTICAST) &&
-                   ether_addr_equal(rx_ring->netdev->dev_addr,
-                                    eth_hdr(skb)->h_source)) {
+               if (unlikely((skb->pkt_type == PACKET_BROADCAST ||
+                             skb->pkt_type == PACKET_MULTICAST) &&
+                            ether_addr_equal(rx_ring->netdev->dev_addr,
+                                             eth_hdr(skb)->h_source))) {
                        dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
                        continue;
                }
@@ -889,13 +887,14 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector 
*q_vector,
                /* populate checksum, VLAN, and protocol */
                ixgbevf_process_skb_fields(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb);
 
+               /* probably a little skewed due to removing CRC */
+               total_rx_bytes += skb->len;
+               total_rx_packets++;
+
                ixgbevf_rx_skb(q_vector, skb);
 
                /* reset skb pointer */
                skb = NULL;
-
-               /* update budget accounting */
-               total_rx_packets++;
        }
 
        /* place incomplete frames back on ring for completion */
-- 
2.52.0

Reply via email to