Hi everyone on keeleynet,
Just wanted to know if any of you know what happens if you accidently
release to the public domain an invention that someone else has already
patented or that is similar enough to cause a lawsuit. I want to release the
entire design for my automobile drive when it is done along with working
blueprints to the public domain.
So far it looks like the most effecient way to drive a car that I can
come up with is to take the Tesla vibratory oscillator technology and see if
it can create liquid nitrogen, one of the books I have says it could create
liquid oxygen, evidently with as little as five pounds of air pressure. I
plan to burn gasoline or diesel at first in my engine until I can machine
ceramics and or stainless alloys. Lots of design changes are being
inplemented in my engine, I am still planning on using the Tesla disk
turbine as the final drive, but using liquid nitrogen expanded in a heat
exchanger to create the huge expansion that actually drives the turbine. The
engines will be used to create heat for nitrogen expansion as they drive
vibratory oscilators that compress the nitrogen, then the nitrogen can be
expanded from the heat that is produced, and also the heat of conpression
can be used to re-expand the nitrogen. Since it is possible to extract heat
from the environment as well as the engine there will be thermal gathering
units ran by a modified heat pump as well. I am attempting zero thermal
losses. Some of the vibratory oscillators will be producing liquid oxygen so
there will be no CO or Hydrocarbon emissions. As a final precaution, though
possibly unnecessary I will use an after burner if necessary. I would rather
burn hydrogen, water or anything else but fossil fuels, but you can aquire
fossil fuels anywhere and they are relatively cheap when you are getting
around 500 mpg with them anyway.
How I came up with 500 Mpg. Ok how did I do that. First my engines are
on call, only run when they need to. I get 30 mpg now right but lets just
say 20 to be conservative, you can double that for an engine on call to 40
mpg. Ok thats been done, but nitrogen expands 900 times its volume when it
is heated, If I am remembering right. Need to look up more stuff but lets be
conservative and say 600 times. That means that for every volume I have I
can fill 600 containers of that volume at a greater heat. operating at a
pressure equal to 6 volumes being in the same space I have 100 spaces, I
just turned 40 mpg into 400 miles per gallon, Did I mention that the engine
is water injected, Kawasaki got 3 times the horsepower out of a short
stroked high rpm KZ 1000 by water injecting it, My engine is not short
stroked and it is not high rpm, it is designed with one thing in mind,
effeciency, and to produce the most power with the least fuel period. So
lets just say that my engine, and capillary puffer carbureator (1) , liquid
oxygen burning engine design, producing way more heat and energy because it
is burning all the hydrocarbons and running so lean it would melt the tops
right out of the pistons if it wasn't water injected got three times 40
miles per gallon in the first place instead of the 40MPG I said, we would be
getting 120 MPG. Then when we added the liquid nitrogen we got 100 times the
propulsion. 1,200 mpg? Say maybe we cut that in half in case we have
friction, though I hope with Indium used in place of babbot I have 300
percent more lubricity and wear life than a regular engine.(There was really
no reason to cut it in half but I know you are having trouble believing me
so I will) Now the tesla disk turbine is 85% effecient so 85% of 600 is 510
miles per gallon. Oh did I mention that air can be regenerated in pressure
and use to provide propulsion many times by being heated? (nitrogen only
does this better)And I forgot all about the vacuum that will be formed when
the nitrogen cools, possible power source for stationary motors, reclaimers
might be to heavy to use in a car, don't know. And I didn't mention either
that I used a redesigned engine and crankshaft that makes the engine have a
tremendous amount of torque and run very balanced. Cylinders at this point
are limited to sixteen with twelve looking like the optimum number. There is
no side thrust to my pistons but I have a crankshaft now so that power
out-put can be balanced better and the motor will run smoother. Any cylinder
number between two and sixteen will work fine so you can balance the engine
to the load. 2 cylinders for motorcyles and small cars, 6-8 cylinders for
gas guzzling 500-700 MPG cars and 10-16 cylinders for trucks tractors and
semi tractor trailers, and trains 150-300 MPG.
I agree fossil fuels are a problem but I doubt that we will do away with
them for awhile and although I am trying to make my own engine run on many
fuels it may be to expensive and complicated to reproduce a multiple fuel
car.
1.
(this design can be completely regulated by puffs of the liquid oxygen
expanded to create flow from a capillary tube, one of the most accurate ways
to meter anything, only problems I am having are making sure my engine can
never backfire because it is using pure oxygen,(explosion potential) I was
forced to creat a backfire chamber with reed valves and add a blower
aparatus to make sure the Oxygen went into the carbureator because of back
pressure that could be created in the ventura part of the carbureator)
