> On 03/28/2012 05:15 AM, lorn.pot...@nokia.com wrote: >> On 27/03/2012, at 9:59 PM, ext André Somers wrote: >> >>> I think most of us would agree that Nokia's communication about the >>> role >>> of Qt in it's mobile phone stragegy has been... eh... lacking. I have >>> good confidence, based on bits& pieces and statements from people I >>> trust, that there is a good place for Qt still on that front, but >>> nobody >>> can say for sure. >> You mean like this? >> http://blog.qt.nokia.com/2011/06/21/qt%E2%80%99s-future-for-nokia-bringing-apps-to-the-next-billion/ >> > > That communication is soon a year old, which is a long time in this > business... > > So personally I'd count that as lacking communication. It leaves > developers (me at least) hoping, rather than being assured, that > something will come out of it. That is a big difference when you have > to assure there is food on the table, not just hope for it. > > > Just my 2 cents, > > Harri
fully agree. The thing is that you even didnt bet for N9. And PureView was a symbian based mobile by accident. > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest