On 2012/06/15 07:26 PM, Charley Bay wrote: > (1) Its interface is too minimal (insufficient) > (2) Its implementation is limited > (3) It does not support real-world-unicode use > > That's my venting because for over a decade I never understood why > people thought std::string was an acceptable component. IMHO it's > absolutely useless. And dangerous. I don't care if I'm the only one on > the planet with my conclusion, but IMHO, std::string is > absolutely unusable insufficient crap.
I enjoyed this article: http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/084.htm Herb Sutter's not too thrilled with it, but iirc the interface being minimal isn't one of the reasons :) -- Regards Alex _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest